CO129-465 - Public Offices & Others - 1920 — Page 10

!

I agre

that the refeart of the frown Advocate muts the founts raised & I Think it shows the recessity for the instruction to the for: (34355) to have

The Orr amended so as

with the D. in E

on

to coincide

The 7.0. wrote

Any : 10th suggesting that the amend. ment sho not include para. 4 of O. in E without previous consultation & according the Gow: was told (39588) to take no further steps in the matter. What effect the dispatches Enclosed herein are to have with regard to the sugrated amendment is not pute clear to me.

I think it is intended that it should be proceded with.

to com

? Ack! &ark whether we are clude having ryand to the previous correspond - Ence that they how wish the amendment of the

12

Our asked for in their letter of July so. which was stayed owing to their letter of Aug., to be now proceeded with. If so, the Gov. will be informed.

Dr.

{

Ius Cillans

9/9/20

Such

A

clear the

are, though I think it obvires that

4041

They wing

१

9

as

thu

Co

в

of the Preveciful order of gro

the amenden Dine of reper

Edi

only be wonde

comfibiliter effiction by ancillary legislation

#. Money

in

for delay,

and the FO. thermagh the asked in such leerestation (on to Aur, I now

desire that it che i pred

? As professed

ISA

18/6/20

At once

AER

9